MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323597863 · doi:10.4006/0836-1398-25.2.233

On intractable tracks

2012· article· en· W2323597863 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Essays · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)PhysicsNondeterministic algorithmPrinciple of least actionConstant (computer programming)Energy (signal processing)ScalingTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsComputer scienceGeometryDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The principle of least action in its original form a la Maupertuis can be understood as the universal quest to consume free energy in the least time. The ensuing dispersion of energy is a nondeterministic process when there are various ways to consume free energy because the flows of energy and their driving forces cannot be separated so as to track the motions by way of integration. Despite this resulting intractability, the natural processes are not random, but the flows of energy themselves will naturally select the least-action paths from available variations. In this way, high-density closed actions will process step by step to lower and lower densities by opening up and expelling one or multiple elements of the absolutely least action, scaling to Planck’s constant. Ultimately the spontaneous symmetry-breaking process will terminate, when the most elementary action in a closed form opens up and transforms to the action of the lowest symmetry, the photon. Consequently, when all entities in nature are described as actions, there is no fundamental difference between particles and their associated forces. The holistic worldview provided by the principle of least action in its mathematical form allows us to understand why nature displays rules and regularities but is nevertheless unpredictable. 2012 Physics Essays Publication. [DOI: 10.4006/0836-1398-25.2.233] Resume: Le principe de moindre action dans sa forme originale, chez Maupertuis, peut etre compris comme la quete universelle de la consommation de l’energie libre dans le temps le plus bref. La dispersion d’energie qui s’ensuit est non-deterministe quand il y a des chemins varies pour la consommation de l’energie libre parce qu’alors les flux d’energie et les forces motrices ne peuvent pas etre separees pour tracer les mouvements en utilisant l’integration. En depit de cette indocilite resultant, les flux d’energie eux-memes selectionneront les chemins de moindre action au milieu des possibilites disponibles. De cette facon, les actions des particules de haute densite progresseront pas a pas vers des densites de plus en plus faibles en s’ouvrant et en expulsant un ou plusieurs elements de la moindre action absolue, qui est etalonnee sur la constante de Planck. Ultimement ce processus de rupture spontanee de la symetrie se terminera lorsque l’action la plus elementaire dans une forme de particule s’ouvre et se transforme dans l’action de symetrie la plus faible, le photon. Consequemment, quand toutes les entite dans la nature sont decrites comme actions, il n’y a pas de difference fondamentale entre particules et leurs forces associees. La vision du monde holistique fournie par le principe de moindre action dans sa forme mathematique nous permet de comprendre pourquoi la nature montre des regles et des regularites mais reste cependant imprevisible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it