Experimental and Computational Studies on Interrupted Nazarov Reactions: Exploration of Umpolung Reactivity at the α-Carbon of Cyclopentanones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A set of densely substituted, α-functionalized cyclopentanones can be generated by a two-component, domino reaction sequence entailing the Nazarov electrocyclization of divinyl ketones and nucleophilic addition of the resulting 2-oxidocyclopentenyl cations by selected trapping modalities. Bypassing the typical eliminative termination, Nazarov oxyallyl species can react with carbon π-nucleophiles through cycloadditions (or formal cycloadditions), in which bridged bicyclic systems are established, or nucleophilic trappings whereby one terminal carbon of the oxyallyl intermediate is subjected to carbon-carbon bond formation. A detailed investigation of reaction parameters to explicitly control the course of the "interrupted" Nazarov reactions is described. This methodology allows for facile installation of α-quaternary centers bearing allyl, alkynyl, and heteroaryl groups in an umpolung fashion. In addition, the trapping event of a Nazarov intermediate with furan was studied by DFT computations, in conjunction with experimental data, offering a rationale for the observed reaction pattern and diastereoselectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".