MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323618848 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2015-0247

Morphological and histochemical characterization of the secretory sites of bioactive compounds in leaves of <i>Lantana camara</i> L. (Verbenaceae)

2016· article· en· W2323618848 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stefany Cristina de Melo Silva, Luiz Ricardo dos Santos Tozin, Tatiane Maria Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Estadual PaulistaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsLantana camaraVerbenaceaeTrichomeBiologyBotanyLantana

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lantana camara L. is a species of Verbenaceae known for its aromatic and medicinal properties. Compounds extracted from its leaves are used to treat infections of the respiratory tract and have demonstrated antimicrobial potential and repellent action to Aedes mosquitoes. Our aim was to identify and characterize the main production sites of the biologically active substances in the leaf blades of L. camara. Leaf samples were collected from plants living in the Brazilian Cerrado and processed according to standard techniques in plant anatomy and histochemistry as well as scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Six morphotypes of glandular trichomes (I–VI) were identified; they differ in shape and size, number of constituent cells, subcellular aspects, and form of accumulation, as well as release and composition of the secretion. Idioblasts producing hydrophilic and lipophilic substances were observed in the mesophyll and may be associated with protection of the plant against herbivores and pathogens and maintenance of the water potential of leaf tissues, complementing the action of glandular trichomes. Our results contribute to the understanding and knowledge of the sites responsible for the production of substances with ecological and medicinal value in Verbenaceae species, and may provide a foundation for future studies in different areas of science focusing on the manipulation of this production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207