MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323660695 · doi:10.2514/6.2002-1206

Bifurcation Analysis of an Airfoil Containing a Cubic Structural Nonlinearity and Subjected to Two-Dimensional Incompressible Flow

2002· article· en· W2323660695 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirfoilBifurcationFlow (mathematics)Nonlinear systemIncompressible flowCompressibilityMechanicsPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the present work is detail bifurcation analysis of an airfoil subjected to two-dimensional incompressible inviscid flow taking into account a cubic structural nonlinearity in the pitch direction. The integro-dierenti al aeroelastic equations of motion for the airfoil are reformulated into a system of six first-order autonomous ordinary dierential equations. The reformulated equations are then used for the bifurcation analysis of an airfoil with a cubic structural nonlinearity in the pitch direction. The equations are either integrated numerically using defect-controlled method or analyzed using collocation method via AUTO software package. Fixed-point solutions are calculated analytically, and bifurcation diagrams showing both stable and unstable limit cycle oscillation are obtained. The types of bifurcations are assessed by evaluating the Floquet multipliers. A period doubling route to chaos was detected, and mildly chaotic behavior in a narrow range of velocity was confirmed via the calculation of the Lyapunov exponents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it