Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Encephalopathic Term Newborn
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neonatal encephalopathy is a neurological emergency with heterogeneous etiologies and several management challenges. Neonatal encephalopathy of hypoxic-ischemic origin is associated with high rate of neonatal morbidity and mortality, and the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of survivors with moderate to severe encephalopathy is poor. Magnetic resonance imaging now provides new insights on the diagnosis and prognosis of this condition. Typical patterns of brain injury have been recognized and in contemporary cohorts of newborns these patterns reflect different risk factors and clinical presentation, as well as specific patterns of neurodevelopmental outcome. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion-weighted imaging, and diffusion tensor imaging are advanced MR techniques that are increasingly used in the assessment of encephalopathic newborns, providing innovative perspectives on neonatal brain metabolism, microstructure, and connectivity. These techniques have been particularly helpful in elucidating the unique time course of neonatal brain injury and in providing quantitative biomarkers for prognostication. To better refine the prognostic value of these new imaging tools, standardization of protocols, imaging modalities and scan timing are needed across centers. It is hoped that these techniques will permit earlier identification of newborns at risk of neurodevelopmental impairment and complement ongoing trials of emerging therapies such as hypothermia and novel pharmacological agents with neuroprotective properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".