MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323736760 · doi:10.1021/cm4041715

Facile Photochemical Preparation of Amorphous Iridium Oxide Films for Water Oxidation Catalysis

2014· article· en· W2323736760 on OpenAlexafffund
Rodney D. L. Smith, Barbora Sporinova, Randal D. Fagan, Simon Trudel, Curtis P. Berlinguette

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMitacsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of CalgaryAlfred P. Sloan Foundation
KeywordsTafel equationIridiumAmorphous solidX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceOxideElectrocatalystOxygen evolutionFourier transform infrared spectroscopyWater splittingCatalysisChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryChemistryElectrochemistryPhysical chemistryElectrodePhotocatalysisCrystallographyOrganic chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Light-driven decomposition of Ir(acac) 3 spin-cast on a conducting glass substrate produces a thin conformal film of amorphous iridium oxide, a -IrO x . The decomposition process, which was carried out under an ambient atmosphere at room temperature and tracked by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, appears to proceed by way of a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) process. The amorphous nature of the films is based on the lack of any observable Bragg reflections by powder X-ray diffraction techniques; the elemental composition was corroborated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. The films are found to be excellent electrocatalysts for mediating the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in acidic media, as evidenced by the onset of catalysis at 130 mV and a Tafel slope of 34 mV dec –1 . These parameters enable current densities of 1 and 10 mA cm –2 to be reached at 190 and 220 mV, respectively. Exposing the films to higher temperatures (500 °C) renders a film of crystalline iridium oxide, c -IrO x, which displays a Tafel slope of 60 mV dec –1, thus requiring an additional 50 mV to reach a current density of 1 mA cm –2 . The film of a -IrO x reported here is among the best OER electrocatalysts reported to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations223
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207