MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2323754709 · doi:10.1093/ahr/120.1.259

Robert MacDougall. The People's Network: The Political Economy of the Telephone in the Gilded Age.

2015· article· en· W2323754709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert G. Angevine

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsInterdependenceDominance (genetics)Gilded AgeHistorySociologyMedia studiesEconomic historyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an increasingly interdependent world, the expansion of transportation and communication networks to cover more territory and connect more people often seems natural and inevitable. As Robert MacDougall reminds us in this insightful comparative history of late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century telephone networks in the United States and Canada, however, the introduction of technologies of reach such as the railroad, telegraph, and telephone has frequently been more contentious and contingent than is commonly perceived. Questions regarding access to and authority over telephone networks produced fierce commercial, political, and cultural battles in both countries. In the United States, they also generated the independent telephony movement, a viable alternative to the dominance of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) and its predecessor, American Bell. One of MacDougall's objectives is to uncover the dramatic but forgotten early history of the North American telephone networks. The drama of those early years has been neglected, he argues, because AT&T has written or commissioned much of the published history of the telephone. Even independent scholars have relied heavily on the records in the AT&T archives. There is also a tendency in the history of technology to treat the most recent device or system as the most logical one and ignore the choices made along the way and possible alternative outcomes. Consequently, the history of the telephone has focused on the gradual expansion of AT&T's high quality network across the nation. MacDougall has scoured trade journals, the records of AT&T's early rivals, and municipal archives to shed light on the independent movement and its “vision of ‘a telephone for the people’” (p. 4). The independents favored decentralized, locally owned and locally oriented telephone networks that offered less expensive but lower quality service to a broader swath of the population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical Review→Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→