MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323780846 · doi:10.1021/jp306798p

The Role of Gold-Adsorbed Photosynthetic Reaction Centers and Redox Mediators in the Charge Transfer and Photocurrent Generation in a Bio-Photoelectrochemical Cell

2012· article· en· W2323780846 on OpenAlexaff
Houman Yaghoubi, Zhi Li, Daniel Jun, Rafael G. Saer, Joanna E. Slota, M. M. Beerbom, R. Schlaf, John D. W. Madden, J. Thomas Beatty, Arash Takshi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclic voltammetryRedoxPhotocurrentAdsorptionElectron transferPhotosynthetic reaction centreX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyChemistryElectrodeElectrochemistryMaterials sciencePhotochemistryInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) are promising materials for solar energy harvesting, due to their high quantum efficiency. A simple approach for making a photovoltaic device is to apply solubilized RCs and charge carrier mediators to the electrolyte of an electrochemical cell. However, the adsorption of analytes on the electrodes can affect the charge transfer from RCs to the electrodes. In this work, photovoltaic devices were fabricated incorporating RCs from purple bacteria, ubiquinone-10 (Q2), and cytochrome c (Cyt c) (the latter two species acting as redox mediators). The adsorption of each of these three species on the gold working electrode was investigated, and the roles of adsorbed species in the photocurrent generation and the cycle of charge transfer were studied by a series of photochronoamperometric, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests. It was shown that both redox mediators were required for photocurrent generation; hence, the RC itself is likely unable to inject electrons into the gold electrode directly. The reverse redox reactions of mediators at the electrodes generates electrical current. Cyclic voltammograms for the RC-exposed gold electrode revealed a redox couple due to the adsorbed RC at ∼ +0.5 V (vs NHE), which confirmed that the RC was still redox active, upon adsorption to the gold. Photochronoamperometric studies also indicated that RCs adsorb, and are strongly bound to the surface of the gold, retaining functionality and contributing significantly to the process of photocurrent generation. Similar experiments showed the adsorption of Q2 and Cyt c on unmodified gold surfaces. It was indicated by the photochronoamperometric tests that the photocurrent derives from Q2-mediated charge transfer between the RCs and the gold electrode, while solubilized Cyt c mediates charge transfer between the P-side of adsorbed RC and the Pt counter electrode. Also, the stability of the adsorbed RCs and mediators was evaluated by measuring the photocurrent response over a period of 1 week. It is found that ∼46% of the adsorbed RCs remain active after a week under aerobic conditions. A significantly extended lifetime is expected by removing oxygen from the electrolyte and sealing the device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207