MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323800879 · doi:10.1021/ef400457y

Evaluation of the Performance of Air Dense Medium Fluidized Bed (ADMFB) for Low-Ash Coal Beneficiation. Part 2: Characteristics of the Beneficiated Coal

2013· article· en· W2323800879 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoal and Its By-products
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Centre for Clean Coal/Carbon and Mineral Processing TechnologiesCarbon Management Canada
KeywordsBeneficiationCoalFly ashParticle sizeFluidized bedMercury (programming language)ChemistrySeparator (oil production)Clean coalMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceWaste managementPulp and paper industryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-rank coals are widely used as fuel in coal-fired power plants. Continuing the use of these fuels is under huge pressure because of stringent environmental regulations. The air dense medium fluidized bed (ADMFB), which is a dry physical coal beneficiation method, can offer an efficient and economical solution for ash removal. The performance of the ADMFB separator in preparing higher quality coals has been studied by detailed characterization of the ADMFB clean coal products with minimum ash content, maximum organic material recovery, or different feed particle sizes in the present work. The percentage of ash removal for the selected samples with particle size of 1–13.2 mm was between 9 and 22% with respect to the feed sample. An increase of all CHNS components and higher heating value (HHV), regardless of the coal particle size, and a very efficient mercury rejection of between 33.7 and 48.6% were observed for most of the beneficiated samples. Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) analysis confirmed the decrease of most of the hazardous elements, such as Pb, Ag, Ba, Cu, Mn, Be, and K, indicating a positive affinity of these elements with the ash-forming minerals of the coal. Some elements, such as As, Se, and Sb, exhibited inconsistent results, which indicates various degrees of organic bonding for these elements. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis of the ashes of the beneficiated coals revealed different decreasing levels of Si, Al, and Mg oxides (main components of clay minerals) and an increase of Na, Ca, and Fe oxides. Lower viscosities, a lower reducing ash fusion temperature (< ∼1250 °C), and consequently, an increased slagging propensity based on a number of simple slagging indices for beneficiated products were obtained. The change in the reactivity of the clean coal products was discussed on the basis of the maximum rate of weight loss ( R max ) and the peak temperature ( T max ) obtained by differential thermogravimetry (DTG). The fine and middle size beneficiated samples showed various degrees of reactivity improvement. R max for the middle size was found to increase by at least 84.5%, and T max for the same was found to decrease by at least 62 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it