MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323828508 · doi:10.5465/amle.2004.14242265

Resource ReviewsGoVenture—Live the Life of an Entrepreneur. Sydney, Canada: MediaSpark Information Technology Solutions, 2000.The Business Disc: How to Start and Run a Small Business. Reisterstown, MD: Maryland Interactive Technologies, 2002.

2004· article· en· W2323828508 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joe Wolfe

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Learning and Education · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness modelMarketingSmall businessNew business developmentBusinessEconomicsComputer scienceOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines two computer-based decision-making experiences and exercises for teaching various business subjects, namely, GoVenture—Live the Life of an Entrepreneur, and The Business Disc: How to Start and Run a Small Business. The objective of GoVenture's designers was to have players experience the entrepreneur's work-a-day world. They have successfully done this by having the player, do all that is necessary to create a retail operation and then run it in simulated real time. Players must go through all the necessary clutter and busy work associated with starting a business, such as obtaining licenses and permits, filing the firm's name, obtaining its government identification number, signing up and making deposits for the business's utilities, and choosing the business and its location. The Business Disc, like the previous one, also has been designed to be an experiential learning and development simulation, but its approach is very different. It is basically a series of branched video clips that take the player through two phases associated with starting a new business. Phase I covers all the basic planning and major decisions that must be made by a start-up. The player meets Harrison Fields, an accountant who guides the participant through these decisions. Immersion in the exercise is very fast because Fields steers the player along the requisite path. Fields covers deciding whether the firm will be in the economy's retail, service, or manufacturing sector; the firm's name; the nature of business and its ownership structure; its location with the options of leasing or renting or owning the firm's property; hiring employees, writing their position descriptions, and setting their work schedules; determining the help's fringe benefits and withholding taxes; setting up all the records needed, and finally setting prices and creating sales estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1890.097

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management Learning and EducationSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207