A Stepwise Solvent-Promoted S<sub>N</sub>i Reaction of α-<scp>d</scp>-Glucopyranosyl Fluoride: Mechanistic Implications for Retaining Glycosyltransferases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The solvolysis of α-d-glucopyranosyl fluoride in hexafluoro-2-propanol gives two products, 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropan-2-yl α-d-glucopyranoside and 1,6-anhydro-β-D-glucopyranose. The ratio of these two products is essentially unchanged for reactions that are performed between 56 and 100 °C. The activation parameters for the solvolysis reaction are as follows: ΔH(++) = 81.4 ± 1.7 kJ mol(-1), and ΔS(++) = -90.3 ± 4.6 J mol(-1) K(-1). To characterize, by use of multiple kinetic isotope effect (KIE) measurements, the TS for the solvolysis reaction in hexafluoro-2-propanol, we synthesized a series of isotopically labeled α-d-glucopyranosyl fluorides. The measured KIEs for the C1 deuterium, C2 deuterium, C5 deuterium, anomeric carbon, ring oxygen, O6, and solvent deuterium are 1.185 ± 0.006, 1.080 ± 0.010, 0.987 ± 0.007, 1.008 ± 0.007, 0.997 ± 0.006, 1.003 ± 0.007, and 1.68 ± 0.07, respectively. The transition state for the solvolysis reaction was modeled computationally using the experimental KIE values as constraints. Taken together, the reported data are consistent with the retained solvolysis product being formed in an S(N)i (D(N)(++)*A(Nss)) reaction with a late transition state in which cleavage of the glycosidic bond is coupled to the transfer of a proton from a solvating hexafluoro-2-propanol molecule. In comparison, the inverted product, 1,6-anhydro-β-D-glucopyranose, is formed by intramolecular capture of a solvent-equilibrated glucopyranosylium ion, which results from dissociation of the solvent-separated ion pair formed in the rate-limiting ionization reaction (D(N)(++) + A(N)). The implications that this model reaction have for the mode of action of retaining glycosyltransferases are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".