MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323953919 · doi:10.1177/155989771210001

ORIGIN Trial Proves Safety of Insulin, Lack of Efficacy for n-3 Fatty Acids

2012· article· en· W2323953919 on OpenAlexaff
R. Buckley, Gilles R. Dagenais

Bibliographic record

VenueMD Conference Express · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulin glargineMedicineIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineImpaired glucose toleranceType 2 diabetesRandomized controlled trialDiabetes mellitusInsulinPopulationEndocrinologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an overview of the Outcome Reduction With an Initial Glargine Intervention Trial [ORIGIN; NCT00069784]. ORIGIN was a large, international, randomized, controlled trial that lasted >6 years in people with new or recently diagnosed diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. ORIGIN is the longest investigation of the effect of insulin treatment on CV outcomes and cancer incidence in this population to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMD Conference ExpressSame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207