Periodic Intermittently Connected-Based Data Delivery in Opportunistic Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
提出一种在机会网络中基于周期性间歇连通的数据传输策略PICD(periodic intermittently connectedbaseddata delivery in opportunistic networks).通过有效利用节点间的周期间歇连通性改善数据传输性能.节点传输概率的计算则充分考虑了其与汇聚点间存在的间歇多跳路径,并将其与消息容忍的传输延迟相结合.首先,采用随机动态规划的方法建立与延迟相关的传输概率模型;然后,通过基于多跳的函数空间迭代法求出一个周期内的与延迟相关的传输概率分布矩阵;节点面向不同消息延迟的传输概率则基于分布矩阵计算获得,以此作为选择下一跳的依据.与延迟相关的概率转发机制提高了消息在容忍的延迟内被成功递交的可能.仿真实验结果表明,与现有的几种数据传输算法相比,在节点具有循环运动特征的环境下,PICD具有较高的数据传输成功率和较低的递交延迟.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".