MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323977593 · doi:10.1061/9780784479162.236

Evaluation of Passive Treatment Technologies for Septic Lagoon Capacity Expansion

2015· article· en· W2323977593 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chee‐Yuen Gan, Pascale Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispose patternEffluentSeptic tankWastewaterSewage treatmentSewageEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, increases in rural development has led to a growing need to effectively manage the resulting municipal and city sewage without the addition of significant cost- and energy- expending infrastructure. Storring Septic Service Limited is a family-owned, licensed wastewater treatment facility located in eastern Ontario; it makes use of a passive waste stabilization pond system to treat and dispose of waste and wastewater in an environmentally responsible manner. Storring Septic, like many other similar wastewater treatment facilities across Canada, has the potential to act as an eco-friendly facility that municipalities and service providers can utilize to manage and dispose of their wastewater emissions. However, it is of concern that the substantial incursion of third party material may be detrimental to the pond system. In order to augment the current facility into a self-sustaining system with the capacity to safely accept septage from other sewage haulers, it was hypothesized that pond effluent may be further treated by three different technology solutions to reduce wastewater quality parameters to quantities below the limits set by the MOE. Two of these solutions make use of biofilm technology and bacterial organisms in order to improve wastewater parameters, and the third utilizes the natural water filtration capabilities of zebra mussels. Pilot scale testing involved monitoring and analyzing the effects on water effluent quality by each of these three technologies in both cold and warm weather. This paper analyzes and compares the results of applying each technology, and aims to understand the important mechanisms behind biological filtration methods in order to choose and optimize the best treatment strategy. In doing so, a recommendation matrix is provided with the potential to be used as a universal implementation strategy for wastewater treatment facilities located in environments of similar climate and ecology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207