MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324007593 · doi:10.1584/jpestics.33.196

The effects of plant activators on leaf spot and anthracnose of Chinese cabbage

2008· article· en· W2324007593 on OpenAlexaff
Yoshihiro Narusaka, Mari Narusaka, Tomonori Shiraishi, Norihiko Izawa, Katsunori Hatakeyama, Hiroshi Abe, Masatomo Kobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pesticide Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlternaria brassicicolaLeaf spotBiologyBrassica rapaAlternariaHorticultureEthephonBrassicaColletotrichum capsiciBotanyColletotrichumFungicideEthylene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alternaria brassicicola and Colletotrichum higginsianum are causal agents of Alternaria leaf spot and anthracnose, respectively, of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa). The effect of plant activators on anthracnose of Chinese cabbage was studied 24-hr after treatment. From the results, it was clarified that the disease was perfectly controlled by pretreatment of plug seedlings with BTH but not with MeJA, which inversely accelerated lesion development. On the other hand, lesion development by A. brassicicola was decreased by pretreatment with ethephon and MeJA but not with BTH, which induced severe symptoms. Based on these findings, we discuss the potential of plant activators to control diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pesticide ScienceSame topicFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFrench-language works237,207