Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Micro-Lines Fabricated by Laser-Assisted Maskless Microdeposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present paper is concerned with the analysis of the microstructural properties of silver micro-lines produced by Laser-Assisted Maskless Microdeposition (LAMM). LAMM is a laser based direct write method used in microscale layered manufacturing. In LAMM, liquid-suspended nanoparticles of a variety of materials are deposited in a layer-by-layer fashion and cured by a laser radiation. In this work, conductive micro-lines of silver with widths of 20 μm are fabricated, and their microstructures as well as electrical and mechanical properties are studied. Investigations show that the microstructures are affected by the laser power and the laser scanning velocity. To find the effect of laser processing parameters on the electrical performance of the samples, the conductivity of the samples are expressed in terms of the effective energy absorbed during laser radiation. It is shown that the conductivity of the sintered samples is increased up to 2 × 105 S.m−1 by raising the effective energy density. In addition, mechanical properties, i.e. modulus of elasticity of one of the fabricated samples are obtained using the nanoindentation test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".