MétaCan
← all works

<i>Sympathy, Sensibility and the Literature of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century</i> by Ildiko Csengei

2016· article· en· 0 citations· W2324021142 on OpenAlex· 10.3138/ecf.2016.28.3.596

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian venueIt was published in a Canadian venue.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: venue_new · design weight: 2684.25 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Book review of an eighteenth-century literary studies monograph; the object is literary sensibility, not research practice.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: editorial/commentary
about Canada: no
confidence: high

This is a literary book review unrelated to research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: editorial/commentary
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Book review of eighteenth-century literature of feeling, not research practice.

Abstract

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

The record

Venue
Eighteenth-Century Fiction
Topic
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Field
Arts and Humanities
Canadian institutions
Funders
Keywords
SympathySensibilityFeelingAestheticsPsychoanalysisPsychologyArtSocial psychologyLiterature
Has abstract in OpenAlex
no