Analysis of Mass Transfer Performance of Monoethanolamine-Based CO<sub>2</sub> Absorption in a Packed Column Using Artificial Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exact and reliable estimation of mass transfer performance is very important for the design, simulation, and optimization of CO 2 absorption in a packed column. In this study, two types of artificial neural networks (ANNs), namely back-propagation neural network and radial basis function network, were applied to predict the mass-transfer performance of CO 2 absorption into aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) in packed columns (containing Berl saddles, Pall rings, IMTP random packing, and 4A Gempack, Sulzer DX structured packing, respectively) from input variables. These variables were inert gas flow rate, liquid flow rate, solution concentration, liquid CO 2 loading, CO 2 mole fraction, temperature, and total packing area, which were considered to predict the targeted output mass transfer variables. The predicted results from ANN were validated against experimental data as well as compared with results from well-known correlations in terms of the volumetric mass flux, CO 2 mole fraction, and temperature profiles along the height of the packed column. The comparisons between the predicted and experimental results showed that the proposed ANN models performed very well in predicting mass transfer performance of CO 2 absorption into aqueous MEA in a packed column.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".