Evaluation of Epoetin Alpha (rHuEPO) and Darbepoetin Alpha (DARB) on Human Burst-colony Formation (BFU-E) in Culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The erythropoietic effect of recombinant human erythropoietin, epoetin alpha (rHuEPO), in promoting the growth of erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E) was compared with darbepoetin alpha (DARB), a rHuEPO analogue obtained by site-directed mutagenesis. Human bone marrow cells derived from healthy donors were cultured with different concentrations of rHuEPO or DARB for 12 - 21 days and BFU-E were counted using an inverted microscope. The EC50 of rHuEPO was about 10-fold lower than DARB and the size of the colonies was significantly larger in rHuEPO-containing cultures using comparable concentrations. The maximum number of colonies obtained in some rHuEPO-containing cultures was also higher than for DARB. The number of colonies in DARB-containing cultures was increased, in part, by the addition of low concentrations of rHuEPO, but not by DARB, even at high concentrations. We conclude that DARB is not as effective as rHuEPO in supporting the in vitro growth of human BFU-E.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".