MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324065829 · doi:10.1097/aap.0b013e318217ab1f

Lateral Versus Medial Needle Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block

2011· article· en· W2324065829 on OpenAlexaff
Rajeev Subramanyam, Vandana Vaishnav, Vincent Chan, Danielle Brown-Shreves, Richard Brull

Bibliographic record

VenueRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlock (permutation group theory)UltrasoundRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: When performing a supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB) under ultrasound (US) guidance, the needle may approach the nerves in-plane with the US beam from 1 of 2 directions relative to the transducer, lateral-to-medial (lateral) or medial-to-lateral (medial). We aimed to compare the rates of sensory and motor block of the 4 major peripheral nerves of the upper extremity following a lateral or medial needle approach for US-guided SCB. METHODS: Eighty adult patients undergoing US-guided SCB for elective hand, wrist, forearm, or elbow procedures were randomized to either a lateral or medial needle approach. A 30-mL local anesthetic admixture (1:1 lidocaine 2%-bupivacaine 0.5% with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected to all patients. Sensory and motor function was assessed by a blinded observer at predetermined intervals. The primary outcome was the rate of sensory block in the distribution of the ulnar nerve measured 20 mins after block performance. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included in the final analysis. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. The rate of ulnar nerve sensory block at 20 mins was 63% in the lateral group and 62% in the medial group (P = 0.81). The rate of ulnar nerve sensory block at 30 mins increased to 89% in the lateral and 84% in the medial group (P = 0.96). The rates of both sensory and motor block in the distributions of the median, radial, and musculocutaneous nerves were high and did not differ between groups at any measured time interval. The block performance time and the postoperative pain scores were similar between the 2 groups. Complications were minor and transient and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of sensory and motor block of all 4 major peripheral nerves of the upper extremity did not differ at any time following a lateral compared with medial needle approach for US-guided SCB. Regardless of needle approach, the rate of ulnar nerve sensory block was less compared with the other peripheral nerves following US-guided SCB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegional Anesthesia & Pain MedicineSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207