MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324092737 · doi:10.1515/1553-779x.2960

ANN - SQP Approach For NOx Emission Reduction In Coal Fired Boilers

2012· article· en· W2324092737 on OpenAlexaff
Ilamathi Balamurugan, Selladurai V. Gounder, Balamurugan Kulendran

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNOxFlue gasCombustionBoiler (water heating)CoalPulverized coal-fired boilerSequential quadratic programmingEngineeringFlueEnvironmental scienceWaste managementProcess engineeringMathematicsQuadratic programmingMathematical optimizationChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this research paper, predictive modelling of NOx emission of a 210 MW capacity pulverized coal-fired boiler and combustion parameter optimization to reduce NOx emission in flue gas is proposed. The effects of oxygen concentration in flue gas, coal properties, coal flow, boiler load, air distribution scheme, flue gas outlet temperature and nozzle tilt were studied. The data collected from parametric field experiments were used to build a feed-forward back-propagation artificial neural net (ANN). The coal combustion parameters were used as inputs and NOx emission as outputs of the model. The ANN model was developed for full load condition and its predicted values were verified with the actual values. The algebraic equation containing weights and biases of the trained net was used as fitness function in sequential quadratic programming (SQP) to find the optimum level of input operating conditions for low NOx emission. The results proved that the proposed approach could be used for generating feasible operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Emerging Electric Power SystemsSame topicAdvanced Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207