Expanding the Library of Secondary Ions That Distinguish Lignin and Polysaccharides in Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Wood
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extracted pine (Pinus spp.) wood and the holocellulose and cellulose fractions of pine were analyzed by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). The main sources of variation among wood constituents were elucidated by principal component analysis (PCA). Peaks characteristic of lignin or polysaccharides were identified through the combination of high mass resolution analyses of pine fractions and high lateral resolution image analyses distinguishing the lignin-rich middle lamella from the secondary cell wall layers in solid wood cross-sections. A collection of peaks was compiled which (1) extends the library of characteristic lignin and polysaccharide secondary ions in wood, (2) can be applied to both high and nominal mass resolution spectra, and (3) is free from peaks that contraindicate between wood components. The removal of additional peaks to avoid mass interferences with common contaminants was also successful. Many of the characteristic peaks were high-intensity fingerprint ions below m/z 100, which provided for rapid analysis of the lignin and polysaccharide biopolymers in woody samples. The analysis also identified important mass interferences with previously reported wood ions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it