MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324105245 · doi:10.1061/40937(261)103

Advanced Finite-Element Predictive Model for the Service Life Prediction of Concrete Infrastructures in Support of Asset Management and Decision-Making

2007· article· en· W2324105245 on OpenAlexaff
Kamel Henchi, E. Samson, F. Chapdelaine, J. Marchand

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalQuébec Metro High Tech Park (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDurabilityService lifeFinite element methodCementitiousMortarAsset (computer security)Computer scienceService (business)Coupling (piping)CorrosionAsset managementDiffusionEngineeringStructural engineeringReliability engineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringDatabaseComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, a new generation of finite-element-based predictive models capable of handling coupled multiple transport mechanisms such as diffusion, advection and electrical coupling were developed to evaluate the durability of concrete structures exposed to chloride-bearing environments. These tools are destined to replace the simplified approach based on Fick's second law. This paper presents a sophisticated finite-element ionic transport software, called STADIUM® that reliably predicts time to initiate corrosion and the multiple alterations that a structure can sustain throughout its service-life. The model is based on a multiionic approach that considers eight ionic species and the chemical interactions between the paste and the pore solution of cementitious materials. A test case of a parking structure shows the benefit of the proposed modeling approach compared to traditional analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207