Sustained acute voltage-dependent blood pressure decrease with prolonged carotid baroreflex activation in therapy-resistant hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Chronic carotid baroreflex stimulation (Rheos system) has been shown to effectively reduce blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. Upon acute stimulation blood pressure also falls as a function of voltage. the aim of this study is to evaluate whether this voltage-dependent blood pressure decrease is preserved after long-term carotid baroreflex stimulation. METHODS: Forty-five patients implanted with Rheos underwent a voltage response test (VRT) before the start of carotid baroreflex activation (1m), as well as after 4 (4m) and 13 months (13 m) of device implantation. After switching off the device for 10 min (0 V), we started the VRT by increasing voltage from 1 to 6 V, by 1-V steps every 5 min. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at the end of every step. RESULTS: At 1m, mean blood pressure was 178/101 mmHg at 0 V and fell to 142/83 mmHg at 6 V. Heart rate fell from 75 to 65 beats/min. At 4m and 13 m mean blood pressure was significantly lower compared to 1m when VRT started at 0 V (170/96 and 161/93 mmHg, respectively). However, pattern of blood pressure decrease during VRT was comparable with this at 1m. Maximum SBP reduction during VRT did not change with long-term therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Acute voltage-dependent blood pressure and heart rate decrease with electrical baroreflex stimulation is preserved after at least 1 year of continuous activation in patients with resistant hypertension. This indicates that response adaptation and nerve fatigue are very unlikely in long-term carotid baroreflex activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".