MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324120775 · doi:10.2495/geo060011

Towards a truly sustainable future and a high quality of life for all people on our planet: the role of the Earth Sciences

2006· article· en· W2324120775 on OpenAlexaff
W. S. Fyfe

Bibliographic record

VenueWIT transactions on ecology and the environment · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPessimismIntellectOptimismFace (sociological concept)Coping (psychology)PoliticsHistoryEnvironmental ethicsBiosphereAestheticsPsychologySociologySocial sciencePolitical scienceEpistemologySocial psychologyPhilosophyLawEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are living in a new period of earth history. I was impressed by the writing of Vladimir Vernadsky, 1929, in his book The Biosphere. He said we were in a transition to a new geological era which he termed the psychozoic era. As he stated, mankind as a whole would become a new and powerful geological entity able to transform the planet. I very much liked the words of Sir Crispin Tickell in his British Association lecture of 1993 "I was recently asked if I was an optimist or pessimist. The best answer was given by someone else. He said that he had optimism of the intellect but pessimism of the will. In short, we have most of the means for coping with the problems we face, but are distinctly short on our readiness to use them. It is never easy to bring the long term into the short term. Our leaders, whether in politics or business, rarely have a time horizon of more than five years". I have been fortunate that I have walked in over 60 nations. When you walk you see, smell, the problems and you meet people of all types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIT transactions on ecology and the environmentSame topicEarth Systems and Cosmic EvolutionFrench-language works237,207