MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324134539 · doi:10.2514/6.2014-0855

Development of passive wireless temperature sensors using metamaterials

2014· article· en· W2324134539 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hasanul Karim, Ahsan Choudhuri

Bibliographic record

Venue52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Texas at El PasoMcMaster University
KeywordsMetamaterialWirelessWireless sensor networkComputer scienceElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless passive temperature sensors have been receiving increasing attention due to the ever-growing need of higher energy efficiency and precise monitoring of temperatures in high temperature energy conversion systems such as gas turbines and coal-based power plants. Unfortunately, the harsh environment such as high temperature and corrosive atmosphere present in these systems has significantly limited the reliability and increased the cost of current solutions. Therefore, this paper presents the concept and design of a low cost, passive, and wireless temperature sensor that can withstand high temperature and harsh environment. The temperature sensor was designed following the principle of metamaterials by utilizing Closed Ring Resonators (CRR) in a dielectric matrix. The proposed wireless, passive temperature sensor behaves like an LC circuit, which has a resonance frequency that is temperature dependent. A full wave electromagnetic solver Ansys Ansoft HFSS was used to validate the model and to evaluate the effect of different geometry and combination of SRR structures on the resonance frequency and sensitivity of the proposed sensor. Conventional compression method using a die-punch assembly was used to fabricate the sensors. To simplify the sensor design, commercially available metal washers were used as CRR structures. Barium Titanate (BTO) was used as dielectric materials. Free space testing was done using a pair of horn antenna connected with a network analyzer to analyze the sensor response at room temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue52nd Aerospace Sciences MeetingSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207