MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324253949 · doi:10.1097/nan.0b013e3182659950

Building a Clinical Trial Process in Oncology

2012· review· en· W2324253949 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Benzel, Barb Nickel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Infusion Nursing · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nurses Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialOncology nursingHealth careMEDLINEIntensive care medicineClinical OncologyCancer treatmentMedical physicsOncologyNursingCancerInternal medicineNurse education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical trials offer patients the opportunity to participate in medical advancement, while providing access to the newest therapies, often at no additional cost. This is especially true in oncology, where rapid acceleration of research has created many promising treatment options for cancer patients. Administration of a clinical trial requires extensive education and collaboration to provide the highest quality of health care within a rapidly evolving environment. As an integral part of this team, the infusion nurse in the oncology setting is in a unique position to enhance patient safety and protection through effective use of clinical knowledge and patient assessment and advocacy skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.075
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.143
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0750.143
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.013
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.864
GPT teacher head0.747
Teacher spread0.117 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Infusion NursingSame topicStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsFrench-language works237,207