MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324262350 · doi:10.1115/imece2010-37747

Realtime Ultrasound Prostate Young’s Modulus Reconstruction Technique Using a Full Inversion Approach

2010· article· en· W2324262350 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Reza Mousavi, Abbas Samani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElastographyPrincipal component analysisComputer scienceStress fieldArtificial neural networkElasticity (physics)Stress (linguistics)Finite element methodYoung's modulusArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmUltrasoundAcousticsMaterials scienceStructural engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we present a real-time prostate elastography reconstruction technique which incorporates an accelerated method of tissue stress calculation in its algorithms. The accelerated FE method uses a database of prostate-tumor configurations obtained from imaging. These configurations undergoing specific mechanical loading, e.g. US probe, are modeled and analyzed using conventional FEM to obtain the corresponding stress fields. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to obtain the main modes of shape and stress fields. As such, the shape and stress fields can be described by these main modes weighted by a small number of weight factors. Next, an efficient mapping technique is developed to relate the weight factors of shape to those of the stress fields. We used Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and PCA based regression for this mapping. Once the mapping function is obtained it can be used for analyzing prostate shapes not included in the database. For a typical prostate, our results indicate that analysis using our technique takes less than 0.1 seconds on a desktop computer irrespective of the model size, while the maximum stress error is less than 5% per element. This mapping is then used for our novel real-time Young’s modulus reconstruction technique in which prostate and tumor moduli are updated iteratively using strain images acquired from an ultrasound imaging system and stress field estimated with the proposed method. Results of elastography show that relative Young’s moduli can be reconstructed fairly accurately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207