Mechanical, water absorption, and aging properties of polypropylene/flax/glass fiber hybrid composites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work investigates the mechanical and aging properties of flax/glass fibers reinforced polypropylene hybrid composites. The mechanical properties as a function of reinforcement content show that adding glass fiber to polypropylene/flax composites improves tensile modulus and strength as well as impact resistance and hardness, but has negligible effect on strain at yield and elongation at break. Water uptake at 85℃ and variations in mechanical behavior are determined after water, thermal, and accelerated UV aging tests. The results indicate that glass fibers enhance water resistance of polypropylene/flax composites. Thermal aging at 85℃ reveals that irrespective of filler type and content the composites are thermally resistant. According to accelerated UV aging tests, the presence of glass fiber accelerates the degradation of the polypropylene matrix, but flax fiber can protect the composites. Finally, a partial least-squares model is built to correlate the composite composition to the properties of aged and unaged specimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it