MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324585205 · doi:10.1149/06405.0083ecst

Combined Surface-Activated Bonding (SAB) Technologies for New Approach to Low Temperature Wafer Bonding

2014· article· en· W2324585205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodic bondingWaferMaterials scienceWafer bondingPlasma activationAnnealing (glass)Void (composites)Thermocompression bondingAdhesive bondingSurface modificationDirect bondingAdhesiveComposite materialNanotechnologyChemistryPlasmaPhysical chemistryLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wafer surface activation is of great importance for low temperature wafer bonding process development. However, different surface activation methods are needed for various bonding materials due to their different requirements and mechanisms for low temperature bonding. A challenge of the low temperature wafer bonding technology is to develop compatible surface activation processes for hybrid surfaces (e.g., Cu/polymer adhesive and Cu/SiO 2 hybrid surfaces). In this study, we developed surface activation processes for low temperature Cu/dielectric hybrid bonding. We report the results of surface treatment for Cu/adhesive hybrid surface by using Ar plasma and Ar fast atom bombardment, and a combined SAB process for SiO 2 hydrophilic bonding. Post-bonding vacuum annealing is employed to develop void-free hydrophilic SiO 2 wafer bonding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it