MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High-Resolution Sub-Doppler Lamb Dips of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>Fundamental Band of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math>

2012· article· lv· W2324596663 on OpenAlexaff
Hsuan-Chen Chen, Chung-Yun Hsiao, Jin-Long Peng, T. Amano, Jow-Tsong Shy

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigh resolutionPhysicsComputer scienceGeologyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high-resolution sub-Doppler Lamb dips of the ν2 fundamental band transitions of H3(+) have been observed using an extended negative glow discharge tube as an ion source and a periodically poled lithium niobate optical parametric oscillator as a radiation source. The absolute frequency of the R(1,0) transition was measured to be 81,720,371.550 MHz with an accuracy of 250 kHz using an optical frequency comb. In addition, we have investigated the linewidth of the Lamb-dip signal of the R(3,0) transition systematically and obtained its pressure-broadening parameter, which may shed some light on the reaction of H3(+) with H2. This is the first observation of the infrared saturated spectrum and the first determination of the pressure-broadening parameter of the ro-vibrational transitions of a molecular ion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207