Bibliographic record
Abstract
Millions of people worldwide suffer from addiction and related comorbidities.1,2 Given its association with high rates of mental and physical problems as well as premature mortality,3-6 substance misuse remains a significant global public health problem and a heavy burden for abusers and their families alike. In addition, methods of administration, including injection and some smoking practices, lead to greater risk of users contracting blood-borne diseases such as HIV, viral hepatitis, and subacute bacterial endocarditis.7 Clearly, addiction is a multifaceted, frequently comorbid problem that cannot be reduced to compulsive substance use. In response to this challenge and to take into account such complexity, addiction research has evolved tremendously over the past few years. Many changes are currently taking place in the field of addiction from both an epidemiologic and clinical research perspective. This In Review represents a timely opportunity to provide psychiatrists and other clinicians with a glance at these new trends and research agenda. We also hope that it will contribute to bolstering a growing interest for substance use disorders within the mental health field.The addiction research community has historically relied on American and European epidemiologic studies to identify and understand trends in substance use and misuse. Largescale Canadian samples have recently generated critical national data and informed more refined and detailed descriptions of these trends in specific populations. Roy, Arruda, and collaborators present a review of Canadian epidemiologic data on substance misuse with a specific focus on newly identified phenomena. They highlight a number of results obtained over the past decade from longitudinal cohorts of street-based drug users, and they discuss the emergence of a prescription opioid use epidemic and its comorbid correlates. This article also looks into the highly prevalent but poorly investigated phenomenon of binge drug use. The authors pinpoint what could be a significant vector of risky behaviours and comorbidities and provide the basis for a complete research agenda that could significantly help to identify a new treatment target. Finally, Roy et al. establish critical emerging trends of mental health comorbidity among highly vulnerable populations of drug users in Canada. This endeavour reminds the field of psychiatry that addiction and ''classic'' mental health problems cannot be dissociated and that the accuracy of our understanding of psychiatric diagnoses, the impact of their symptoms, and their etiology may have to be reassessed in substance users.Blaine and collaborators provide another fascinating example of the widened conception of addiction, which goes beyond substance use per se. Stress vulnerability and craving have been acknowledged as prominent features of addiction, and the latter has even been included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for substance use disorder. They are now known to be associated with a wealth of adverse outcomes such as higher rates of relapse even after prolonged periods of abstinence. A significant number of biological, neuroanatomic, psychologic, and environmental correlates of craving have been identified and are now better understood. Craving and stress have thus become key targets of addiction treatments, including pharmacotherapy and relapse prevention therapy. In this very thorough yet accessible article, Blaine and collaborators review the main findings pertaining to craving and stress vulnerability as critical features of alcohol dependence, and they underline their potential as innovative treatment targets to reduce the burden related to addictive disorders.While these developments have made significant contributions to our understanding of addiction and its comorbidities, we are left with many challenges. An overhaul of current practices is undoubtedly required to have a concrete positive impact on the lives of substance abusers and their families. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".