MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324611281 · doi:10.1524/para.2010.0034

Gesundheitsförderung als Kontaktzone. Eine chilenische Gemeindepsychiatrie für die Mapuche

2010· article· de· W2324611281 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Markus Wiencke

Bibliographic record

VenueParagrana · 2010
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zusammenfassung In diesem Aufsatz wird der Begriff der ,Kontaktzone‘ für den Bereich der psychischen Gesundheitsförderung entwickelt. Anhand von Datenmaterial, das aus einer chilenischen Gemeindepsychiatrie für die Mapuche stammt, wird erläutert, dass sich mit dem Begriff der ,Kontaktzone‘ mehr Dimensionen berücksichtigen lassen als mit dem sozialräumlichen Settingbegriff der Ottawa-Charta (WHO, 1986). Die beiden zentralen Konzepte der Charta, ,Empowerment‘ und ,Enablement‘, werden auf die mimetischen Wechselbeziehungen zwischen dem therapeutischen Setting und den Alltagskontexten seiner Nutzerinnen und Nutzer bezogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParagranaSame topicCommunity Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207