MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324620803 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00097

Characterization of Variant Soft Nanoparticle Structure and Morphology in Solution by NMR Spectroscopy

2015· article· en· W2324620803 on OpenAlexafffund
Muzaddid Sarker, Robin E. Fraser, Michael D. Lumsden, Darren Anderson, Jan K. Rainey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNanoparticleNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopySpectroscopySolventMaterials scienceChemistryParticle sizePhysical chemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physicochemical properties of soft nanoparticles, most notably size, morphology, and ligand interactions, typically depend upon the solution environment in which they are suspended. Comprehensive characterization in a given environment is therefore essential. We have employed high-resolution solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, nuclear spin relaxation measurements, and diffusion ordered NMR spectroscopy (DOSY) techniques to thoroughly characterize polymeric nanoparticles formed by salt-induced collapse of a methacrylic acid–ethyl acrylate copolymer stabilized by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. UV-dose-dependent production of new chemical species is apparent from 1 H and 13 C chemical shift patterns. 1 H– 13 C correlation spectroscopy reveals that cross-linking is likely responsible for nanoparticle structural integrity. Paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) unambiguously shows protection of photochemically derived moieties from solvent, with a UV-dose-dependent decrease in particle size. Temperature-dependent swelling and solvent-induced contraction demonstrate that increased UV dose leads to an increase in the proportion of compact, solvent protected particle core relative to more dynamic, solvent accessible shell. Correlation of disparate solution-state NMR observables allowed for these conclusions and is readily generalizable to the in situ characterization of the exact state of a wide variety of soft nanoparticles as a function of environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207