MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324644055 · doi:10.1021/ef100621s

Pore-Level Investigation of Heavy Oil and Bitumen Recovery Using Solvent −Aided Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SA-SAGD) Process

2010· article· en· W2324644055 on OpenAlex
Omid Mohammadzadeh, Nima Rezaei, Ioannis Chatzis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteam-assisted gravity drainageMicromodelPetroleum engineeringSolventAsphaltOil sandsAPI gravityProcess (computing)Capillary actionAsphalteneChemical engineeringChemistryPorous mediumMaterials sciencePorosityGeologyComposite materialOrganic chemistryCrude oil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Attempts have been made to reduce the energy requirements of steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) projects through coupled thermal and solvent processes (i.e., hybrid SAGD). The augmented process brings superior features to the SAGD process in terms of reduced energy requirement, enhanced produced oil quality, and also improved oil recoveries. The pore-level recovery mechanisms of the hybrid SAGD process have not been investigated yet. The main objective of this paper is to visually investigate and to document the pore-scale events during the hybrid SAGD process using glass micromodel type of porous media. Different additives ( n -pentane and n -hexane) were added to steam prior to injecting into the models. Experiments were conducted in an inverted-bell vacuum chamber to reduce the excessive heat loss to the surroundings. The results indicate that the gravity drainage process takes place through a layer of pores composed of 1−5 pores in thickness, in the direction perpendicular to the nominal oil−gaseous mixture interface, in the mobilized region. The interplay between gravity and capillary forces results in the drainage of the mobilized oil. The visualization results demonstrated the coexistence of water-in-oil and solvent-in-water emulsification at the interface because of the local condensation of both steam and the vaporized solvent. The extent of emulsification depends directly on the temperature gradient between the gaseous mixture and the mobile oil phase. Asphaltene precipitation was also observed when the condensed solvent reached the bitumen interface. As the nature of the process involves partially miscible displacements, the extent of film-flow drainage of the mobilized oil was also significant. Other pore-scale phenomena include localized entrapment of steam and vaporized solvent followed by condensation, snap-off of liquid films, steam and solvent vapor condensation at the interface because of the temperature gradient and capillary instabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it