MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Els fonaments d'una veritable autonomia en els infants petits

2008· article· ca· W23246539 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Judit Falk

Bibliographic record

VenueInfància: educar de 0 a 6 anys · 2008
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and bioethics in healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El diccionari Larousse defineix l'autonomia com llibertat de governar-se per les propies lleis sense minvar la llibertat dels altres. L'autonomia es tambe la capacitat per a un individu d'assumir la plena responsabilitat dels seus actes. Pares i professionals de la petita infancia desitgen veure que els seus fills esdevenen autonoms segons aquesta definicio, pero el cami pel qual podran arribar-hi no sempre els resulta clar. Aixo porta a punts de vista molt variats sobre l'autonomia de l'infant petit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.060
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.060
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfància: educar de 0 a 6 anysSame topicEthics and bioethics in healthcareFrench-language works237,207