MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324710670 · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1001.2011.04020

Cycle Symmetry Reduction and Its Extension on Three-Valued Models

2011· article· en· W2324710670 on OpenAlexaff
Ou Wei, Yong Yuan, Xinye Cai, Zhiqiu Huang, XU Bing-Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Software · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEvaluation and Optimization Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSymmetry (geometry)Reduction (mathematics)MathematicsQuotientPermutation (music)Extension (predicate logic)Permutation groupPure mathematicsSymmetry operationCombinatoricsComputer sciencePhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

为了将对称化简扩展到更多的非对称系统上,扩展了传统的基于自同构的对称性,提出了一种称为循环对称的新的对称性.证明了采用循环对称置换群或者由一组循环对称置换所生成的置换群仍可得到与原模型互模拟的对称商结构,从而达到化简系统规模的目的.进一步地,研究如何将对称化简应用于多值模型.多值模型可以有效地表示系统中的不确定信息,正越来越多地用于软件系统的建模与分析中.针对一种具体的多值模型——三值模型,定义传统的对称化简和循环对称化简在其上面的扩展.最后,分析三值模型的商结构与由约简得到的二值模型商结构之间的关系,证明了两种途径的等价性.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of SoftwareSame topicEvaluation and Optimization ModelsFrench-language works237,207