Review: <i>Collections and Objections: Aboriginal Material Culture in Southern Ontario</i>, by Michelle A. Hamilton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| November 01 2011 Review: Collections and Objections: Aboriginal Material Culture in Southern Ontario, by Michelle A. Hamilton Collections and Objections: Aboriginal Material Culture in Southern Ontario by Michelle A. Hamilton. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010. 352 pp.; clothbound, $95.00; paperbound, $34.95. Alexandra Lewis-Lorentz Alexandra Lewis-Lorentz Central Washington University Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar The Public Historian (2011) 33 (4): 127–129. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2011.33.4.127 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Alexandra Lewis-Lorentz; Review: Collections and Objections: Aboriginal Material Culture in Southern Ontario, by Michelle A. Hamilton. The Public Historian 1 November 2011; 33 (4): 127–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2011.33.4.127 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentThe Public Historian Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2011 by The Regents of the University of California and the National Council on Public History. All rights reserved.2011 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.066 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".