MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2324778257 · doi:10.1115/fuelcell2010-33035

On the Measured PEMFC Anode and Cathode Reversible Heats

2010· article· en· W2324778257 on OpenAlexaff
Odne Stokke Burheim, Signe Kjelstrup, Jon G. Pharoah, Preben J. S. Vie, Steffen Møller-Holst

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeCathodeOverpotentialMaterials scienceProton exchange membrane fuel cellHydrogenThermodynamicsThermoelectric effectAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrochemistryChemical engineeringChemistryElectrodeFuel cellsChromatographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recently constructed 2D calorimeter was used to measure the work and the total heat production of a single PEM fuel cell that is operated on hydrogen and oxygen at 50 °C and 1 bar. The cells had different membranes and catalyst layers, but the same porous transport layer and micro-porous layer. In this paper the distribution of the reaction entropy between the anode and the cathode, also known as the Peltier heats, was determined. This was done by the use of the measured heat through the anode and the cathode polarisation plates, the measured cell resistance, the measured overpotential and a fuel cell thermal model. The results show that the reaction entropy is almost solely related to the cathode and that the Peltier heat of the anode is near zero.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→