Modeling of a Circular Magnetic-Fluid Deformable Mirror for Ophthalmic Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adaptive optics (AO) systems make use of active optical elements namely wavefront correctors to improve the quality of imaging through dynamically varying media. Vision science is an area of application of these systems where they have been used to enhance the resolution of imaging of internal parts of the human eye. However, their widespread use in clinical devices is limited due to the insufficient performance and high costs of the currently available wavefront correctors. Recently, magnetic fluid deformable mirrors (MFDM) have been proposed as a type of wavefront correctors that can sufficiently overcome the problems associated with the existing wavefront correctors. The practical implementation of this new type of deformable mirrors is contingent on the development of effective methods to model and control the shape of their deformable surface. To help meet this critical requirement, this paper presents an analytical model of a circular MFDM in cylindrical geometry. The resulting model can be used in the design of control systems for ophthalmic adaptive optics systems. Preliminary results of an experimental investigation aimed at validation of the analytical model are also presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".