MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324851203 · doi:10.1021/ic402574d

A Novel Square-Planar Ni(II) Complex with an Amino—Carboxamido—Dithiolato-Type Ligand as an Active-Site Model of NiSOD

2014· article· en· W2324851203 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daisuke Nakane, Yuko Wasada‐Tsutsui, Yasuhiro Funahashi, Tsubasa Hatanaka, Tomohiro Ozawa, Hideki Masuda

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInformation Technology Center, Nagoya UniversityJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceRyerson University
KeywordsChemistryDisproportionationLigand (biochemistry)SuperoxideElectron paramagnetic resonanceActive siteRedoxNickelHydrogen bondPhotochemistryResonance (particle physics)ElectrophileStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryInorganic chemistryCrystallographyMoleculeNuclear magnetic resonanceOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To understand the role of the unique equatorial coordination environment at the active center in nickel superoxide dismutase (NiSOD), we prepared a novel Ni(II) complex with an amino-carboxamido-dithiolato-type square-planar ligand (1, [Ni(2+)(L1)](-)) as a model of the NiSOD active site. Complex 1 has a low-spin square-planar structure in all solvents. Interestingly, the absorption wavelength and ν(C═O) stretching vibrations of 1 are affected by solvents. This provides an indication that the carbonyl oxygens participate in hydrogen-bonding interactions with solvents. These interactions are reflected in the redox potentials; the peak potential of an anodic wave (Epa) values of Ni(II)/Ni(III) waves for 1 are shifted to a positive region for solvents with higher acceptor numbers. This indicates that the disproportionation of superoxide anion by NiSOD may be regulated by hydrogen-bonding interactions between the carboxamido carbonyl and electrophilic molecules through fine-tuning of the redox potential for optimal SOD activity. Interestingly, the Epa value of the Ni(III)/Ni(II) couple in 1 in water (+0.303 V vs normal hydrogen electrode (NHE)) is similar to that of NiSOD (+0.290 V vs NHE). We also investigated the superoxide-reducing and -oxidizing reactions of 1. First, 1 reacts with superoxide to yield the superoxide-bound Ni(II) species (UV-vis: 425, 525, and ∼650 nm; electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) (4 K): g// = 2.21, g⊥ = 2.01; resonance Raman: ν((16)O-(16)O)/ν((18)O-(18)O) = 1020/986 cm(-1)), which is then oxidized to Ni(III) state only in the presence of both a proton and 1-methylimidazole, as evidenced by EPR spectra. Second, EPR spectra indicate that the oxidized complex of 1 with 1-methylimidazole at the axial site can be reduced by reaction with superoxide. The Ni(III) complex with 1-methylimidazole at the axial site does not participate in any direct interaction with azide anion (pKa 4.65) added as mimic of superoxide (pKa 4.88). According to these data, we propose the superoxide disproportionation mechanism in superoxide-reducing and -oxidizing steps of NiSOD in both Ni(II) and Ni(III) states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation MechanismsFrench-language works237,207