Are Two Azo Groups Better than One? Investigating the Photoresponse of Polymer-Bisazobenzene Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Azobenzene chromophores are an ideal choice for material applications where functionality needs to be activated in a precise remote-controlled fashion. The azobenzene stimuli-response falls into two categories, either based on efficient trans -to- cis photoisomerization and a high cis yield enabling on–off type functions, or relying on a fast trans – cis – trans cycling creating motion in the material system. Herein, we show that using bisazochromophores instead of the more common monoazobenzene derivatives makes a difference in the performance of light-responsive azopolymers, more specifically in photo-orientation and all-optical surface patterning. Our findings point out that polymer-bisazobenzene complexes are an attractive alternative as high-performance photoreponsive materials and that although their properties are highly sensitive to the extent of conjugation in the system, they can be designed into relatively transparent films with high performance for all-optical patterning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".