MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324991600 · doi:10.1190/ice2015-2210638

What Enlightenment Can We Gain From World Conventional Oil and Gas Discovery in the 21st Century?

2015· article· en· W2324991600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chongzhi Tao, Jinyin Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, Australia 13-16 September 2015 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnlightenmentComputer scienceEnvironmental sciencePhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the late 90s, it is clear that the discovery of oil and gas fields and original petroleum reserves in the entire word shows a decreasing trend. Therefore, many petroleum geologists had been overwhelmingly pessimistic about the exploration prospect in the 21st Century. However, since the beginning of the 21st century, worldwide oil and gas discovery has still kept flourishing. It is probably fair to say that major oil and gas reserve growth is still from conventional discoveries, though the unconventional exploration has grew rapidly. Concept innovation pushed oil and gas discovery father, as the global demand for energy has ramped up. Before 2000, the bulk of petroleum reserves was mainly discovered in post-salt reservoirs in the Campos Basin. Important breakthroughs in postsalt were also made in the Santos Basin in 2001. However, during the next 5 years, the discovery of original petroleum reserves in the two basins showed a decreasing trend. Petrobras began focusing more on sub-salt and announced the discovery of the Tupi filed in 2006. The move into subsalt exploration did make sustaining discovery for oil and gas fields possible in the Campos Basin and Santos Basin. Technology advances opened up large swathes of the offshore to the possibility of drilling, as land-based exploration became less fruitful. The Gulf of Mexico has been only a part of the global offshore boom. Significant exploration has also taken place off the coasts of Brazil and the West Africa, Russia, Norway and Canada. Propelled by advances in drilling technology and seismic imaging and better understanding of deepwater turbidite reservoirs, major petroleum discoveries have been made in deepwater and ultra-deepwater. A complete view of risk and the perseverance in exploration are the key to giant field discoveries. Before 2006, the exploration degree was substantially low and drilling risks were too high in the Rovuma Basin. Exploration experts from the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation did much research work and located many prospects in the Rovuma Basin. Although the drilling of well Windjammer-1 and Windjammer-2 was end in a virtual halt successively because of some technological problems, they never gave up. In the end, the sidetracking horizontal well Windjammer 2ST1 encountered major discoveries in the Oligocene and Paleocene strata and the first giant gas field—Windjammer gas field was found. Since then, other petroleum corporations followed successively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, Australia 13-16 September 2015Same topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207