Bibliographic record
Abstract
Droits démocratiques et identités,, sous la direction de Bjarne Melkevik et Luc Vigneault., Collection Dikè, Les Presses de l'Université Laval, 2006. 148 p. Ce ouvrage collectif regroupe les contributions de huit auteures et auteurs au débat politique, social et juridique sur les implications de la mondialisation, pour la société civile d'une part et pour l'institution juridique d'autre part. C'est dans le contexte contemporain de la mondialisation que ce livre traite d'abord des droits démocratiques, puis du lien qui existe entre l'identité et le droit. Lecteurs et lectrices sont ainsi plongés, grâce à diverses perspectives et approches, dans un profond questionnement de la compatibilité entre le citoyen et le droit et dans une réflexion sur le décalage qui peut exister entre l'ordre économique mondial, la démocratie, les droits humains, la possibilité ou non de l'universalité, les différences identitaires et le sens même du politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".