Evaluation of the Passing Behavior of Motorized Vehicles When Overtaking Bicycles on Urban Arterial Roadways
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper evaluates the influence of on-street bike lanes on the lateral separation between motor vehicles and cyclists when the vehicle overtakes the cyclist and investigates the relationship between the passing behavior and traffic conditions. A bicycle was instrumented with a sensor array that consisted of an ultrasonic sensor, a GPS receiver, and a video camera. A total of 5,227 passing events were recorded across different categories of urban arterials. The results showed that the facilities with on-street bike lanes provided greater separation between bicycles and motor vehicles. Passing maneuvers with lateral separation of less than 1,000 mm (3.30 ft) were observed less frequently on the facilities with on-street bike lanes. Further, it was found that, in the absence of a bike lane, a higher proportion of passing vehicles moved laterally to the left and encroached on the adjacent lane. The analysis showed that for arterial roadways without on-street bike lanes, drivers tended to provide increased lateral clearance by either changing lanes or encroaching on the adjacent lane. However, drivers' ability to perform either of these maneuvers may be restricted by surrounding vehicles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it