Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantum entanglement is foundational to quantum computation. Yet little is known about how this phenomenon is modified by gravitational effects. One place to begin this study is by consideration of observers in relative acceleration. Here I describe recent work exploring the relationship between quantum entanglement between states shared by such observers. Due to the Unruh effect, the entanglement is degraded and asymptotically reaches a minimum value in the infinite acceleration limit. For bosons this value is zero, but for fermions it is nonzero, in which case quantum information tasks such as teleportation between parties in relative uniform acceleration can always be performed. I discuss the implications of these results for observers in gravitational fields. © 2008 Physics Essay Publications. DOI: XXXX Resume: L’enchevetrement quantique est fondamentale pour le calcul quantique. Pourtant tres peu est connu a propos de comment ce phenomene est modifie par les effets gravitationnels. Une maniere d’entamer cette etude est de considerer des observateurs en acceleration relative. Ici je decris des travaux recents qui explore les relations entre enchevetrement quantique d’etats partages par de tels observateurs. A cause de l’effet dit de Unruh, cet enchevetrement est degrade et atteint asymptotiquement une valeur minimum dans la limite d’une acceleration infinie. Pour les bosons cette valeur est nulle, alors que pour des fermions cette valeur est non zero. Dans ce cas, les operations d’informations quantiques tel que la teleportation entre differentes parties en acceleration relatives peuvent toujours etre etre implementees. Je discusse les implications de ces resultats pour des observateurs dans un champ gravitationel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".