Safeguarding the intangible cultural heritage through a tri-sector model: the jewellery quarter in the Old City of Istanbul
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper discusses the possibilities of reviving the traditional craftsmanship in its original, historic location through a bottomup approach. The jewellery production in the Old City of Istanbul is clustered in the Grand Bazaar (Kapalicarsi) and its vicinity where the crafts' characteristics has been embedded into the built environment. The traditions of production and urban life are merged in this part of the Old City. Therefore, the authors designate this specific area as "the jewellery quarter" and propose a tri-sector regeneration approach through which the artisans in the area can safeguard their craft and place relying on the local social capital. In this context, this paper proposes an Artisan-led Regeneration Model which allows craftsmen to initiate regeneration projects at various scales while relying on institutional support and guidance of local jewellers. The model assumes that collaboration and solidarity can be orchestrated by a non-governmental organization such as the Jewellery Quarter Foundation. Furthermore, the model assumes that a bottom-up regeneration policy should be compresensive and give priority to social and economic development in the area. Thus, a multipurpose center is proposed to serve as the headquarters of the regeneration where artistic, cultural, social, and educational activities as well as spatial improvemens can be administered. The third proposition of the model is to introduce tenant artisans as one of the rightful stakeholders into the legal system concerning urban operations. Including the tenant artisans into the institutional structure would reinforce the grassroots character of the regeneration process and diminish the risk of gentrification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it