Synthesis of β-Cyclodextrin-Modified Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs)@Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>@SiO<sub>2</sub> Superparamagnetic Nanorods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports on the synthesis of β-cyclodextrin-modified CNC@Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 superparamagnetic nanorods for the removal of two model compounds: procaine hydrochloride and imipramine hydrochloride. During the synthetic process, sustainable natural materials and low-cost chemicals were used, and mild reaction conditions were adopted. TEM and SEM images indicated good dispersion of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles with uniform silica coating on CNCs. The thickness of the silica coating was controlled by manipulating the amounts of precursor solution used. TGA data confirmed that the silica coating significantly enhanced the thermal stability of CNCs. The onset decomposition temperature of CNC@Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 hybrids increased by 60 °C compared to pure CNCs. XRD, EDS, and FT-IR analyses confirmed the structure of CNC@Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 and the successful grafting of β-cyclodextrin. The CNC@Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 @β-CD hybrids displayed good adsorption toward the model pharmaceutical residues: procaine hydrochloride and imipramine hydrochloride.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".