MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325091270 · doi:10.1021/am100645j

Self-Assembly of Colloidal Quantum Dots on the Scaffold of Triblock Copolymer Micelles

2010· article· en· W2325091270 on OpenAlexaff
Mingfeng Wang, Meng Zhang, James Li, Sandeep Kumar, Gilbert C. Walker, Gregory D. Scholes, Mitchell A. Winnik

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicelleMaterials scienceCopolymerPolymerPolystyreneQuantum dotColloidSelf-assemblyChemical engineeringPolymerizationEthylene oxidePolymer chemistryNanotechnologyAqueous solutionOrganic chemistryComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the co-self-assembly of a polystyrene-poly(4-vinylpyridine)-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer with CdSe nanocrystals (quantum dots, QDs) and with a styrene compatible phenylenevinylene conjugated polymer (MEH-PPV) in mixtures of chloroform and 2-propanol. The polymer itself (PS(577)-P4VP(302)-PEO(852), where the subscripts refer to the number average degree of polymerization) forms worm-like micelles when 2-propanol is added to a solution of the polymer in CHCl(3). In the presence of increasing amounts of QDs, the structures become shorter and form only spherical hybrid micelles (with QDs bound to the surface) at 4:1 QD/polymer w/w, accompanied by free QDs. These structures retain their colloidal stability in 2-PrOH, suggesting that even the free QDs bear a surface shell of block copolymer. The presence of MEH-PPV has no affect on this self assembly. One of the most remarkable observations occurred when the samples in 2-PrOH were centrifuged to remove the free QDs accompanying the hybrid micelles. The micelles sedimented, but upon redispersion in 2-PrOH, rearranged to form colloidally stable long branched cylindrical structures including cylindrical networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207