MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Administrative Data as a Tool for Arthritis Surveillance

2003· article· en· W2325098469 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth E. Powell, Robert A. Diseker, Rodney Presley, Dennis Tolsma, Stic Harris, Kristen J. Mertz, Kevin R. Viel, Doyt L. Conn, William McClellan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Public Health Management and Practice · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographicsPublic healthPublic health surveillanceMedicineArthritisEnvironmental healthHealth servicesPopulationDemographyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The public health burden of arthritis and related conditions is incompletely described by commonly used public health surveillance systems. We examined the potential of administrative data as a supplement. The administrative data sources we used underestimated the prevalence of arthritis and overestimated service utilization for persons with arthritis when data from only one year were used. The use of five year's data doubled the prevalence estimate and reduced the service utilization estimate by half. The demographics of the population covered by administrative data also influence the prevalence estimate. Administrative data may usefully supplement routine public health surveillance systems but must be used with caution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Public Health Management and PracticeSame topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207